Law and Orderi Read on Kotaku That It Was Better Than Civ 5

You lot know about how individuals proceeds control of the ability of the Land and then abuse that power similar former U.s. President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Iraq which was highly profitable for some Us businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Republic of iraq had a nuclear weapons plan which was a serious world security threat when Iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion past the state of war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush Great britain The Telegraph Past Chrissy Iley 15 Feb 2011.

Call up how Bush was supported past Uk Premier Tony Blair who helped past persuading the British Parliament to join the US with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'southward weapons of mass destruction which did non exist but which Blair claimed could exist deployed inside 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If y'all call up that and so you will know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Notice how they persuade us nosotros are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin save us all if we trust them?

This trickery is not new.  Information technology had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously almost how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated by vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the illness came nearly as a consequence of the interaction of three completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living weather condition, particularly nutrition and sanitation. The consequence cannot be owing to the smallpox vaccine – any vaccine which takes over 100 years to piece of work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty affliction called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was especially the example when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for breeding and spreading affliction: London's start park built later rich feared disease spread from slums Britain The Contained By Andy McSmith Friday 07 November 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to be reassured the State would go on them condom from the threat of disease.  The bulk of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could reach this by ensuring the then truly "great unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than the disease itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" still contracted the illness: Smallpox Mortality, UK, Us, Sweden.

Now you tin can read a relatively short but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its role in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Medico – Baronial 27, 2013

SMALLPOX Mortality- United kingdom, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs below discover the large numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  By 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, every bit the medical "consensus" view tells us. Any vaccine which takes 100 years to "piece of work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and information, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the residuum of the UK and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table beneath].  Leicester's approach too cost far less.

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" Past J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book equally .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

TABLE 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Name.	Period.	Small-Pox.  Cases	Minor-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Japan	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	7.1
British Army (India)	1860-1908	2,753	307	11.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	eight.8
Royal Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	8.0
Chiliad Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving upwardly vaccination)	1880-1908	i,206	61	five.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, and then that they may exist compared either manner with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Purple Navy, are not due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? Information technology would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would have soared with a corresponding result—but on the opposite side."

TABLE 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Condition	Minor-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	ane,594	16.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	7,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£ii,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	30	four.ten	£one,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Dr.

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu flavor and the enthusiastic calls to use the flu vaccine, you might be wondering where the thought of vaccination got its start. Where did the idea of injecting whole or $.25 of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious disease begin?

Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Most nowadays the same basic tale of the brilliant observation of a simple country doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a deadly and frightening illness of that fourth dimension – smallpox, or as it was often called the speckled monster. In a contempo and popular book, The Panic Virus, the writer reiterates this classic tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an viii-year old boy named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'southward cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'due south hands. The boy came down with a slight fever, but zip more. After, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a full-blown, albeit balmy, example of the disease. Nothing happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox over again; again, nada. [ane]

Edward Jenner's idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin discussion for moo-cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but eventually the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in identify, smallpox would exist tamed and the earth would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the archetype Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly ophidian-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a deadly enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors merits that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" take been saved.[2]

But legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to back up a belief, reach an iconic condition while any unsavory aspects nigh the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. It begins with the concept of using small amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the artillery of salubrious people. This idea was introduced to the Western world by Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with knowledge of the practise of inoculation confronting smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a fourth dimension and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would practice ameliorate against the illness than if they contracted it at some maybe less desirable time and place in the hereafter.

The idea was embraced past the medical profession and enthusiastically skilful. But because of the complication and danger involved, inoculation remained an functioning that could only exist afforded by the wealthy.[3] The process did often help protect the individual that was inoculated, just in that location was still an estimated 2-5% that died as a result.[4,5] Nevertheless, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality charge per unit in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[six] Just, was the deviation in mortality due to inoculation alone? Or could it take had something to practice with the fact that the wealthy had better access to more nutritious food and a cleaner surround than the majority of order?

There was 1 major and by and large unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more deaths than there would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the writer recognized that smallpox was a contagious affliction and that the do of variolation would create new vectors to spread information technology. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years later, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse issues, because information technology caused more deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably like the plague a contagious illness, what tends to stop the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends information technology; what tends to spread the contagion, tends to increment that danger; the practise of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contamination, for a contagious disease is produced by Inoculation where it would not otherwise take been produced; the identify where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than information technology would spread from a center where the disease should happen in a natural style; these centers of contamination are patently multiplied very profoundly by Inoculation . . .[seven]

However, while the popularity of variolation varied, the problem of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Because variolation had go a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically continued past most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox connected to be spread past this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our fable. It was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect ane from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-twelvemonth-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later on deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox equally a exam to see if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the boy did not contract clinical smallpox, it was causeless that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with just rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be allowed to smallpox, there were doctors of the time who challenged this myth, considering they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a coming together of the Medico-Convivial Society, Jenner was ridiculed over his practise.

Merely he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The moo-cow doctors could take told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed cow-pox . . . [eight]

From the beginning there were problems with Jenner's procedure. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox matter obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to see if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect whatsoever of them. Jenner received the report merely decided to ignore the results because they were not in back up of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was quickly embraced by many in the medical profession equally the reply to combating smallpox. By 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the conventionalities that the process would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs continued to cover Jenner's ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that at that place were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were yet dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the finish of the year 1799. A month subsequently it was inoculated with small-pox matter without event, and a few months subsequently took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A woman-servant to Mr. Take chances, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had moo-cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she defenseless small-pox, and died. iii and 4. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, 3 years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted minor-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . xiii. The child of Mr. R died of small-scale-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were bodacious of its security. The vaccinator's name was concealed. 14. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam'southward office . . . died of small-pox a year after vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was non living upwardly to its promise to protect from smallpox. A report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of pocket-size-pox subsequently vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Note that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an xviii% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality rate equally smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This loftier fatality rate forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Another article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the most good practitioners, is at present alarmingly keen.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Brown, a surgeon with xxx years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no one in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice." Just after vaccinating one,200 persons, he became disappointed in the hope of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people still could contract and even die from smallpox, and that he could no longer back up the practice.[13]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a trend to embrace information technology as a new form of income. Information technology is therefore quite significant for a doctor to have spoken out against information technology every bit Dr. Brownish did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could nevertheless infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could likewise exist infected.

. . . during the years 1820, i, and, 2 [1820-1822] at that place was a great hubbub about the pocket-size-pox. It broke out with the swell epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-pox before, and often severely; well-nigh to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, information technology left some solitary, but fell upon great numbers.[xiv]

William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical exercise. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, accept taken the real small-pox later on, and have either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![xv]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that material was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination connected for decades, but as failures increased at that place was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed authorisation, and in that location were calls to obtain fresh cloth direct from cows.[16]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine fabric came from cows, Jenner actually believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, at that place were many attempts to recreate an original moo-cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was simply smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new disease.[18] This faulty conventionalities would result in the creation of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a human being who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow'south udder. He then took pus from that cow and used information technology to vaccinate people. A big smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A after inquiry determined that this was zilch more than the old practice of smallpox inoculation.[twenty]

Non only was vaccination declining and causing smallpox epidemics, but in that location were besides reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For example, a skin condition called erysipelas was a especially prolonged and painful way to die.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, anile five years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (ix days)." He had been vaccinated at the historic period of 4 months; 1 cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; two practiced cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, aged 10 weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, anile thirteen weeks, died of "general erysipelas after vaccination, effusion of the brain."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing diverse epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke before the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the idea that syphilis could be transplanted by vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and now I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis by means of the vaccine. I practice this very reluctantly. At present I practise not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

Equally it became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was non what information technology was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial organisation intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nix to curb the trouble of smallpox. Information from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting around 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the great 1872 epidemic. Later on 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the most severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no outcome at all (Graph 1). In fact, more people died in the 20 years afterwards the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the twenty years before.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

By this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a unmarried vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were made that revaccination had to exist performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, at that place were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent physician of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being made past vaccinators. Immense fiscal gain combined with the strength of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 alone they amounted to £54,727, and in the present year they will get nearly a quarter one thousand thousand. Other sums, also, which I cannot name, accept been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much gain?

[26]

In England, governmental command strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did non vaccinate their children. Nevertheless, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics connected to occur. A great pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-iii g four hundred and threescore-nine cases of pocket-size-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of nine thousand three hundred and 90-2 small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thou eight hundred and l-iv had been vaccinated. Seventeen and i-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole country more than one hundred and twenty-two 1000 vaccinated persons take suffered from small-pox . . . Official returns from Deutschland show that between 1870 and 1885 i million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine rubber, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine motility. People began to resist the regime and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backfire culminated in the peachy demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester'south government, which had pushed for vaccination through the utilize of fines and jail time, was replaced with a new government that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. Past 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to 10%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a cheap and effective means that eliminated the need for vaccination. However, in that location were dire predictions from the majority of the medical customs that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination charge per unit would effect in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the boondocks's residents were steadfast in their conventionalities that vaccination was not necessary to command smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that past abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed equally the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were loftier.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a great manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a 1000000, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an feel extending over a catamenia of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-scale-pox and far less afflicted past that affliction since it abandoned vaccination than information technology was at a fourth dimension when xc-v per cent of its births were vaccinated and its adult population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was often promoted equally a condom procedure, it oftentimes acquired sickness or even expiry. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more than than one,600 in England (Graph 3). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph iv).

Graph two: Leicester England smallpox mortality rate vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales full deaths from cowpox and other furnishings of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the end of the 1800s, smallpox changed its character. After the summer of 1897, the severe blazon of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United States. Smallpox turned from a affliction that killed 1 in 5 of its victims to 1 that just killed anywhere from i in l and subsequently to as depression as i in 380. The affliction could all the same impale, but having become so much milder, it was oft mistaken for various other pox infections or pare eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild blazon of smallpox began to prevail in the South and after gradually spread over the state. The mortality was very low and information technology [smallpox] was normally at first mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 commodity in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox expiry rate was around 20%, as information technology had been historically. The table also showed that afterwards 1896 the death rate barbarous off quickly, starting with half-dozen% in 1897 to every bit low every bit 0.26% by 1908. Every bit the mild form of smallpox replaced the classic blazon, smallpox could be difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild affliction of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a small-scale communicable disease of babyhood, and is chiefly of import considering it frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very hard to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s it was recognized that the new form of smallpox produced piddling in the way of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although there has been no protection past vaccination, the grade of the disease is extremely balmy. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the constitutional symptoms balmy or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely low vaccine coverage rate, there was never a resurgence of smallpox. Fifty-fifty though smallpox was not a major issue, the practice of smallpox vaccination connected from the time of the last smallpox death in the United States in 1948 up until 1963. This resulted in an estimated 5,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 study detailed the cases of 9 children in which 2 died of a skin condition due to vaccination, now being termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated past the authors to be between one in twenty,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to twoscore%.[35] Yet, they acknowledged that well-nigh cases were non reported and in that location was no accurate accounting on this consequence of vaccination. In that location were also an estimated 200 to 300 deaths every bit the outcome of smallpox vaccination, while during the same fourth dimension there had merely been i smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox death in the United States post-obit an importation occurred in 1948, simply since that fourth dimension at that place have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, equally recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his military father afterward the male parent was vaccinated. After a prolonged admission, and a calendar week of experimental treatments including allowed globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The female parent also required treatment and virus was found all over the firm.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study idea that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually accept been even college. This written report only examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the United States. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modern wellness-intendance organization, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the entire globe?

In that location were those in the medical community who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. Nosotros are ashamed to jettison the thought completely and perchance afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put usa in the wrong. We prefer to let compulsory vaccination die a natural death and are relieved that the full general public is not curious enough to need an inquest. In the meantime our attention is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as most the just medically promoted way to deal with illness, there were doctors finding amazing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a common food product that is made through fermentation of a diversity of sources. An 1877 commodity described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the employ of Acetic acrid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as practical to minor pox. Dr. Roth offset claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more than reliable as a safety in small-pox than Belladonna in crimson fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed 2 table-spoonfuls of vinegar, later on breakfast and at evening, for 14 days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the rubber treatment died, while among those nether ordinary handling the bloodshed was as usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's power to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take care of other people with smallpox without fear of contracting the disease. The writer notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective confronting smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Once again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple cider vinegar and no other blazon of vinegar should be used three or 4 times a twenty-four hours to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretarial assistant of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the slap-up men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the forepart in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need accept no fear of smallpox if he volition take two or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar 3 or four times a solar day." The discussion may at present be regarded as closed, and smallpox at concluding is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem empty-headed, but only because most people have been conditioned to accept the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, disease-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected beast'southward (unremarkably a moo-cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human being arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a disease that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of salubrious collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and too gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, equally a result, literally comes unglued and falls autonomously.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King'southward College, described the poor diet of aureate miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fatty, coffee, and alcohol while working long, difficult days nether the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient nutrition led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gold miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living well-nigh entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour fabricated into concoction-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of strong coffee, and large quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sun, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same fourth dimension subjected to the most intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Blitz of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil State of war twice every bit many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For example, the causes of death listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy direct accounted for at least 2-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next mutual cause of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for but a pocket-sized fraction. Those who were killed in bodily battle or who died every bit a result of their wounds deemed just for 1 percent of the full deaths.

Other large infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (also known equally pertussis) all profoundly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive refuse of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph 5 & 6).

Graph 5: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph 6: England and Wales measles mortality charge per unit from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the globe from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical conventionalities that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine religion. Only the true history shows us a dissimilar reality.

The make name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the globe psyche equally something to protect someone from an illness. This conventionalities spawned off numerous other ideas using the aforementioned notion of injecting whole or parts of affliction matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is zilch close to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead we were left with the mythical history of Jenner'southward great discovery and the continued onslaught of dangerous vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are now a regular matter from cradle to grave, all in the proper noun of supposedly healthier people. Now that the pall has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, practise more and more vaccines seem like a skillful idea to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping coughing, and lost remedies tin can exist found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk's book "Dissolving Illusions" which tin can be found on amazon.com

Bibliography:
one.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
2.Scientific discipline the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
three.Victor C. Vaughan, Physician, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.V. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
5.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the First Planting, Progressive Improvements and Nowadays Land of the British Settlements of Due north-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
six.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Knowledge and the 'Opening' of Japan, Stanford University Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Magazine and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
eight.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
ix.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
10.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What information technology Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
eleven."Vaccination by Human activity of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. VIII, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
xiii.Mr. Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
14."Observations past Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Two, 1829, p. 583.
15.William Cobbett, Communication to Immature Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
xvi.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. II, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. twenty, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Advice and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, Medico, "Fractional Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United states of america," Transactions of the American Medical Clan, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
20.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Relate, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Report of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the State of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. iv, February 1909, p. fifty-51.
24."Small-scale-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. 6, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, April 1911, vol. nineteen, no. 4, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.Grand. West. Harman, MD, "A Md's Argument Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Brief: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Sit-in Confronting Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. Due west. Hodge, Medico, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Non by the Propagation of Illness," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Periodical, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. 15.
31.J. Due west. Hodge, MD, "How Small-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Mag, vol. III, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles V. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Illness equally Shown by the History of Smallpox in the U.s.," The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Manufacturing plant Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.Five. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Price Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Book 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds Md and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, August 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Correct to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, University of California Printing, p.21.
37.The Yale periodical of biological science and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. 10.
38.Maggie Flim-flam, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological back-number," Lancet, Jan ane, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acetic Acid in Scarlet Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Periodical of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Preclude Smallpox," The Critique, Jan 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. Six, no. 1, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Health. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of King's Higher," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Do good to Mankind, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, regime, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine courtroom, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

Law and Orderi Read on Kotaku That It Was Better Than Civ 5

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post